Thursday, October 13, 2011

Booking Through Thursday


Booking Through Thursday

If you could get a sequel for any book, what would it be?

This is a hard question, I myself like a stand alone book. If your satisfied with the ending , Why go on.

12 comments:

  1. Agreed. Sometimes they just ruin the whole thing by writing a sequel.:-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like stand alones, too, but sometimes miss characters when I have to tell them goodbye.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yup, very true.

    Thanks for visiting mine :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree!
    Though then there are the novels with the sequels that kind of suck and you wish you hadn't read them--know what I mean?
    Some books, I like the characters so much I wouldn't mind "visiting" them again. Though, it's very true that if the ending is one that you like, why spoil it?
    Great answer!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree. Sometimes you want the story to be completed in a single book and there is nothing worse than an unnecessary sequel that ruins a perfectly good ending. Thanks for stopping by my blog :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. I posted reviews today where the sequel was better. I think that's rare, tho. I have read a few series as one LARGE volume, and I think I prefer that... if the author has such a big story in mind from the beginning. Interesting thought.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I completely agree. This is a hard question. If it's a good stand alone, sequel is not needed. Thanks for sharing and thanks for stopping by my blog!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anthonynorth, GIGI Ann-Glad you stopped by.

    Vicky- I agree!

    Bermudaonion- So true.

    Library Snake- thanks! for coming by.

    Burgandy Ice, Celine, Sierra- Thanks! for commenting.

    Claire- you too!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm glad you liked the Hunger Games. I'm the reverse. I prefer a good series over a stand alone. I get attached to the characters.

    ReplyDelete